Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 14:40:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2AA465ADC772960C33288354166FBB88D5093D8AB6FC3B9C42F077A5604A677
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article linked in the proposed note discusses a civil case regarding a previous settlement, not a criminal case regarding rape. Ronaldo was never found not guilty of rape in court and his accuser wasn’t “proven” to have lied. There was no trial because too much time passed. https://apnews.com/article/ronaldo-rape-lawsuit-vegas-appeal-soccer-935996e981e80c5d44c61c6a7f905689

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786678212300353911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D2AA465ADC772960C33288354166FBB88D5093D8AB6FC3B9C42F077A5604A677
  • createdAtMillis - 1714833610998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786678212300353911D2AA465ADC772960C33288354166FBB88D5093D8AB6FC3B9C42F077A5604A677