Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 14:00:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 313CE6EBB285180F7DC000156A724312A9F0BF7A1E19AB713001D4821C0D9F0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article linked in the proposed note discusses a civil case regarding a previous settlement, not a criminal case regarding rape. Ronaldo was never found not guilty of rape in court and his accuser wasn’t “proven” to have lied. There was no trial because too much time passed. https://apnews.com/article/ronaldo-rape-lawsuit-vegas-appeal-soccer-935996e981e80c5d44c61c6a7f905689

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786678212300353911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 313CE6EBB285180F7DC000156A724312A9F0BF7A1E19AB713001D4821C0D9F0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1714831207450
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786678212300353911313CE6EBB285180F7DC000156A724312A9F0BF7A1E19AB713001D4821C0D9F0E