Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 23:07:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 199E7E76868F14EC3996205D38735875C51EB0312DFCD5FB9FB918E8F314F8B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article linked in the proposed note discusses a civil case regarding a previous settlement, not a criminal case regarding rape. Ronaldo was never found not guilty of rape in court and his accuser wasn’t “proven” to have lied. There was no trial because too much time passed. https://apnews.com/article/ronaldo-rape-lawsuit-vegas-appeal-soccer-935996e981e80c5d44c61c6a7f905689

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786678212300353911
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 199E7E76868F14EC3996205D38735875C51EB0312DFCD5FB9FB918E8F314F8B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1714864074367
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786678212300353911199E7E76868F14EC3996205D38735875C51EB0312DFCD5FB9FB918E8F314F8B3