Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 09:20:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22FBA065547A15DEC4A075E022AD994E87868AD1F19F4CEE659805A153B99B3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. En el titular de la noticia ya indica que se trata de la opinión de un relator concreto, pero es que además el op es una conocida cuenta satírica y en esa línea va el texto.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786666924920693208
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22FBA065547A15DEC4A075E022AD994E87868AD1F19F4CEE659805A153B99B3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1714814406548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178666692492069320822FBA065547A15DEC4A075E022AD994E87868AD1F19F4CEE659805A153B99B3E