Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 00:34:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 556B39C1FDC142955C229C699A485EEE3D6C26889D2E98F173DB421A000A209F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unless the actual TEXT of the post in question contains a factual error, there is no need for a note. Debating the implications belongs in comments. Additionally, notes are to be standalone. Do not submit notes that only make sense as addendums to other notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786518429715124334
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 556B39C1FDC142955C229C699A485EEE3D6C26889D2E98F173DB421A000A209F
  • createdAtMillis - 1714782860781
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786518429715124334556B39C1FDC142955C229C699A485EEE3D6C26889D2E98F173DB421A000A209F