Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 04:49:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31F8DE9E5392D4B640EF89F87C6D7916DB64A0028C179761D4F58154CAF1304F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This lawsuit is using a very broad definition of free speech that does not meet the Canadian definition of the right to free expression https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art2b.html Dr Strauss undermined public health efforts to control COVID and resigned of his own accord, no one limited his speech. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/matt-strauss-queens-university-lawsuit-covid-response-1.6930567

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1786515579831976246
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 31F8DE9E5392D4B640EF89F87C6D7916DB64A0028C179761D4F58154CAF1304F
createdAtMillis - 1714798168879
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 178651557983197624631F8DE9E5392D4B640EF89F87C6D7916DB64A0028C179761D4F58154CAF1304F