Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-03 19:20:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - @Pilestedt words the post in a way that is safe for Arrowhead, avoiding a bad-faith statement towards their own publisher, Sony. Arrowhead knows about the FAQ in the link, which is exactly why it is included in the tweet; they're likely hoping to bring the focus to Sony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786436164179619945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1714764035205
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786436164179619945FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3