Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 09:32:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C0B5CA7F6F7A68A2B2D6C9F09E298BB279FC81C75558B2BCA14DAEBFBE07DDE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Schlagzeile ist grob irreführend. Es ist unwahr, dass AstraZeneca erstmalig eine schwere Nebenwirkung eingeräumt hätte. Vielmehr wurden solche laufend dokumentiert und finden sich seit 2021 in den Dokumenten der EMA https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/vaxzevria-previously-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-epar-product-information_en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786435718098596140
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C0B5CA7F6F7A68A2B2D6C9F09E298BB279FC81C75558B2BCA14DAEBFBE07DDE
  • createdAtMillis - 1714815149889
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17864357180985961407C0B5CA7F6F7A68A2B2D6C9F09E298BB279FC81C75558B2BCA14DAEBFBE07DDE