Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 08:36:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93F4708C5D4AF60B6821F571F0AFBB491A48776044B0A3E020252C04DE7EB521
Participant Details

Original Note:

Very few Climate Change denial papers are submitted for peer review by other scientists in the same field. https://theconversation.com/whos-your-expert-the-difference-between-peer-review-and-rhetoric-1550 When they are, flaws in the assumptions, mathematics or conclusions have been found, and documented, in all of them https://qz.com/1069298/the-3-of-scientific-papers-that-deny-climate-change-are-all-flawed Search engines have been changed to reflect this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786317759669776657
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93F4708C5D4AF60B6821F571F0AFBB491A48776044B0A3E020252C04DE7EB521
  • createdAtMillis - 1714898218339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178631775966977665793F4708C5D4AF60B6821F571F0AFBB491A48776044B0A3E020252C04DE7EB521