Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 13:50:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E9AE402C6994B979C128C5CCB06660F334B91465C8C64EEEFA46D9F524B0ED9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Very few Climate Change denial papers are submitted for peer review by other scientists in the same field. https://theconversation.com/whos-your-expert-the-difference-between-peer-review-and-rhetoric-1550 When they are, flaws in the assumptions, mathematics or conclusions have been found, and documented, in all of them https://qz.com/1069298/the-3-of-scientific-papers-that-deny-climate-change-are-all-flawed Search engines have been changed to reflect this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786317759669776657
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E9AE402C6994B979C128C5CCB06660F334B91465C8C64EEEFA46D9F524B0ED9
  • createdAtMillis - 1714830619803
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17863177596697766578E9AE402C6994B979C128C5CCB06660F334B91465C8C64EEEFA46D9F524B0ED9