Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-03 08:09:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C09C1581C3A05AC79429A4D9304F1F098CC0C8F6704EEE7C1DF4F9FA279ABA26
Participant Details

Original Note:

誤情報を含むポストです。 新型コロナ後遺症に対するイベルメクチンは、2つの大規模無作為化比較試験でプラセボと差はなく、効果を示せていません。また、新型コロナ後遺症にイベルメクチンが有効であったとする無作為化比較試験は存在しません。 PRINCIPLE https://www.journalofinfection.com/retrieve/pii/S0163445324000641 COVID-OUT https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00299-2/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786258841791045675
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C09C1581C3A05AC79429A4D9304F1F098CC0C8F6704EEE7C1DF4F9FA279ABA26
  • createdAtMillis - 1714723741672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786258841791045675C09C1581C3A05AC79429A4D9304F1F098CC0C8F6704EEE7C1DF4F9FA279ABA26