Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-03 05:28:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2C7BD2AF6BFAE9E768A4E5047D7C4A1FD120DA736280AC0B02A5BB4020AC9F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading interpretation presented in the headline exaggerates the ruling's scope by suggesting that it condones marital rape of wives above the age of 15. Supreme court back in 2017 already declared Sexual intercourse with wife below 18 Years amounts to Rape. https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court-unnatural-sex-man-wife-not-rape-absence-woman-consent-immaterial-256819 https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2017/10/11/sexual-intercourse-wife-18-years-age-rape-sc-holds/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786254850029936892
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2C7BD2AF6BFAE9E768A4E5047D7C4A1FD120DA736280AC0B02A5BB4020AC9F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1714714113679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1786254850029936892A2C7BD2AF6BFAE9E768A4E5047D7C4A1FD120DA736280AC0B02A5BB4020AC9F5