Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 23:50:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E04CE566EF008F493BB1BDDC8F44F2FB737605DE224DE75BB001694946647053
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AARO historical report has come under significant criticism since its release for bias and a lack of rigor. David Grusch has not provided any details to AARO at this time, therefore they cannot have debunked them. https://thedebrief.org/aaros-historical-report-a-tale-of-factual-errors-and-old-mistakes-repeated/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786171668970328554
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E04CE566EF008F493BB1BDDC8F44F2FB737605DE224DE75BB001694946647053
  • createdAtMillis - 1714693813078
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786171668970328554E04CE566EF008F493BB1BDDC8F44F2FB737605DE224DE75BB001694946647053