Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 18:32:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58866B1E0BD164B2CA7D081A0B50CEE6DBFBAA5B1DE63ECA66B9123E31370387
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AARO historical report has come under significant criticism since its release for bias and a lack of rigor. David Grusch has not provided any details to AARO at this time, therefore they cannot have debunked them. https://thedebrief.org/aaros-historical-report-a-tale-of-factual-errors-and-old-mistakes-repeated/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786171668970328554
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58866B1E0BD164B2CA7D081A0B50CEE6DBFBAA5B1DE63ECA66B9123E31370387
  • createdAtMillis - 1715020346546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178617166897032855458866B1E0BD164B2CA7D081A0B50CEE6DBFBAA5B1DE63ECA66B9123E31370387