Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-03 20:31:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F9A12D8B1207B8CCA28EA59C120C38AEB215C02E4CB1DFECD02D50DA96CF3F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Dit bericht klopt: de claim is: er is peer reviewed onderzoek. Rebuttals kunnen via het wetenschappelijke publicatiesysteem worden gestuurd en past niet hier.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786140635612774481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F9A12D8B1207B8CCA28EA59C120C38AEB215C02E4CB1DFECD02D50DA96CF3F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1714768260146
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17861406356127744812F9A12D8B1207B8CCA28EA59C120C38AEB215C02E4CB1DFECD02D50DA96CF3F6