Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-03 08:28:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7FD0F819240720D47F1E2AD756CABE08E9BEF7B02CD7936C80D7C76DB8A9D03
Participant Details

Original Note:

En el post, Iker afirma que se le llamó negacionista por aportar datos reales e irrefutables en su momento, y que ahora, años después, la propia prensa que intentó manchar su imagen, comparte la misma información que él ya dió en su programa. Las notas no son necesarias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786088574158348649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7FD0F819240720D47F1E2AD756CABE08E9BEF7B02CD7936C80D7C76DB8A9D03
  • createdAtMillis - 1714724938638
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786088574158348649E7FD0F819240720D47F1E2AD756CABE08E9BEF7B02CD7936C80D7C76DB8A9D03