Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 20:09:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 775717F30F22835712F9F280B7AC62D74EEAF7843F3BC5E805AABE47DDAF470D
Participant Details

Original Note:

En el post, Iker afirma que se le llamó negacionista por aportar datos reales e irrefutables en su momento, y que ahora, años después, la propia prensa que intentó manchar su imagen, comparte la misma información que él ya dió en su programa. Las notas no son necesarias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786088574158348649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 775717F30F22835712F9F280B7AC62D74EEAF7843F3BC5E805AABE47DDAF470D
  • createdAtMillis - 1714680553155
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786088574158348649775717F30F22835712F9F280B7AC62D74EEAF7843F3BC5E805AABE47DDAF470D