Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 20:11:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49EEA064A0AF5CB193E3F0A6800EBA9E82413ED72A59C6BED2C1F69FCD1B319A
Participant Details

Original Note:

En el post, Iker afirma que se le llamó negacionista por aportar datos reales e irrefutables en su momento, y que ahora, años después, la propia prensa que intentó manchar su imagen, comparte la misma información que él ya dió en su programa. Las notas no son necesarias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786088574158348649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49EEA064A0AF5CB193E3F0A6800EBA9E82413ED72A59C6BED2C1F69FCD1B319A
  • createdAtMillis - 1714680694875
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178608857415834864949EEA064A0AF5CB193E3F0A6800EBA9E82413ED72A59C6BED2C1F69FCD1B319A