Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 18:36:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A3716834D5AE0E37DE2A8FF145B4BB200572491B1C4D908B2227D33CB2F3CFE
Participant Details

Original Note:

En el post, Iker afirma que se le llamó negacionista por aportar datos reales e irrefutables en su momento, y que ahora, años después, la propia prensa que intentó manchar su imagen, comparte la misma información que él ya dió en su programa. Las notas no son necesarias.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786088574158348649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A3716834D5AE0E37DE2A8FF145B4BB200572491B1C4D908B2227D33CB2F3CFE
  • createdAtMillis - 1714675012281
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17860885741583486492A3716834D5AE0E37DE2A8FF145B4BB200572491B1C4D908B2227D33CB2F3CFE