Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 14:18:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BBFA534BEB12BA59B257CECE4FA6668A2EE581D8884FCF096C439C88CDBA0427
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - es claramente broma, igualmente deade un punto de vista historiografico se puede debatir: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2037749 (Wikipedia no es una fuente de calidad)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785950942413623597
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BBFA534BEB12BA59B257CECE4FA6668A2EE581D8884FCF096C439C88CDBA0427
  • createdAtMillis - 1714659515119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785950942413623597BBFA534BEB12BA59B257CECE4FA6668A2EE581D8884FCF096C439C88CDBA0427