Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 15:24:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84CED321991F3897C94C4C1D550B67DABEF662AF36B680AF261ED17D0CFF5C39
Participant Details

Original Note:

投稿者の主張は、本人の発言や投稿にないものを勝手に捏造された報道について語っており それに対して「こう報道された事実がある」という指摘は無意味であり不要なCNです https://t.co/W3SjgDogaK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785841668283130363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84CED321991F3897C94C4C1D550B67DABEF662AF36B680AF261ED17D0CFF5C39
  • createdAtMillis - 1714663482864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178584166828313036384CED321991F3897C94C4C1D550B67DABEF662AF36B680AF261ED17D0CFF5C39