Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 21:43:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD81A4C3F397EAB59281FC8B2890551C1873B51943ED4A83EACC0646A283988C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Link to the open-access study https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2024-65164-001.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785739479866880286
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD81A4C3F397EAB59281FC8B2890551C1873B51943ED4A83EACC0646A283988C
  • createdAtMillis - 1714599839215
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1785739479866880286DD81A4C3F397EAB59281FC8B2890551C1873B51943ED4A83EACC0646A283988C