Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 18:58:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBAE3A0509A88D92D1E544F0A121F8BA59953E1633A500377628112B5681C7EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The only thing accurate in this post is the £3000 figure. The rest is completely fabricated by the account. https://t.co/1nwk4ql4wT This account has been posting fake or merely half true information for years https://thecritic.co.uk/the-curious-case-of-rs-archer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785719264822898882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBAE3A0509A88D92D1E544F0A121F8BA59953E1633A500377628112B5681C7EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1714589920358
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785719264822898882DBAE3A0509A88D92D1E544F0A121F8BA59953E1633A500377628112B5681C7EE