Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 22:14:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28B89BEB40785E7AF56E5CA204600A663A6ED4906D1C6BDD32731F73EB87F9DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The only thing accurate in this post is the £3000 figure. The rest is completely fabricated by the account. https://t.co/1nwk4ql4wT This account has been posting fake or merely half true information for years https://thecritic.co.uk/the-curious-case-of-rs-archer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785719264822898882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28B89BEB40785E7AF56E5CA204600A663A6ED4906D1C6BDD32731F73EB87F9DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1714601659640
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178571926482289888228B89BEB40785E7AF56E5CA204600A663A6ED4906D1C6BDD32731F73EB87F9DA