Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 13:19:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E9EE0343F4BAE44C350E0E6D2888426F1C692DD5E9BF31226F7C771B7F4FA1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nothing in the images, comments, or original article states that this is a "statistical error" or an outlier. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/06/weekinreview/06happy.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785701747329061092
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E9EE0343F4BAE44C350E0E6D2888426F1C692DD5E9BF31226F7C771B7F4FA1F
  • createdAtMillis - 1714655944563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17857017473290610925E9EE0343F4BAE44C350E0E6D2888426F1C692DD5E9BF31226F7C771B7F4FA1F