Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 07:01:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EFF12DC04C22CDB7F970A0A32133E03B6D8D2342AE421EBD6D3642563639271
Participant Details

Original Note:

この世論調査自体に問題はありません。 しかし、調査した質問票を載せておらず誘導質問になっているか、いないかは、この記事からだけでは判断できません。そのため世論を誘導しようとしている可能性が否定できない状態です。 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/cookeryscience1968/25/2/25_167/_pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785659605307330889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9EFF12DC04C22CDB7F970A0A32133E03B6D8D2342AE421EBD6D3642563639271
  • createdAtMillis - 1714892517989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17856596053073308899EFF12DC04C22CDB7F970A0A32133E03B6D8D2342AE421EBD6D3642563639271