Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 15:39:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6679EAE1AB32B07A03336275064AAA282E8F9B0CC7B07163C6A0BADA44C8492
Participant Details

Original Note:

A las "NNN": el post busca blanquear la imagen de un cuerpo que demuestra de forma reiterada no ser de fiar, como prueban las otras CN y decenas de citados. Podéis marcar las CN por "lenguaje tendencioso", pero no defendáis que "NNN" cuando falta este muy relevante contexto. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/es/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1785633960527011948
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F6679EAE1AB32B07A03336275064AAA282E8F9B0CC7B07163C6A0BADA44C8492
createdAtMillis - 1714577969630
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1785633960527011948F6679EAE1AB32B07A03336275064AAA282E8F9B0CC7B07163C6A0BADA44C8492