Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 14:16:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDBB51D0547734FF388F546CFE17B5EF5C1CD5C0F498385548990BC1526B45DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

A las "NNN": el post busca blanquear la imagen de un cuerpo que demuestra de forma reiterada no ser de fiar, como prueban las otras CN y decenas de citados. Podéis marcar las CN por "lenguaje tendencioso", pero no defendáis que "NNN" cuando falta este muy relevante contexto. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/es/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785633960527011948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDBB51D0547734FF388F546CFE17B5EF5C1CD5C0F498385548990BC1526B45DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1714659382525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785633960527011948CDBB51D0547734FF388F546CFE17B5EF5C1CD5C0F498385548990BC1526B45DB