Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 18:52:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DEA560771969327C5B1639E1B76C92F443ED7BBD58FF049D4E802D3246D0C31
Participant Details

Original Note:

A las "NNN": el post busca blanquear la imagen de un cuerpo que demuestra de forma reiterada no ser de fiar, como prueban las otras CN y decenas de citados. Podéis marcar las CN por "lenguaje tendencioso", pero no defendáis que "NNN" cuando falta este muy relevante contexto. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/es/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1785633960527011948
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 3DEA560771969327C5B1639E1B76C92F443ED7BBD58FF049D4E802D3246D0C31
createdAtMillis - 1714675935100
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17856339605270119483DEA560771969327C5B1639E1B76C92F443ED7BBD58FF049D4E802D3246D0C31