Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 02:44:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FCA877349499CB0254CEEAEDCAF40BB8FC9749B4AC0ED2475A23E460D6049D32
Participant Details

Original Note:

En ningún momento del segundo debate se puede apreciar algún apuntador o dispositivo auditivo de la Candidata en cuestión. La imagen está alterada de manera digital ya que se puede apreciar la linea de pixeles corregidos entre la oreja y el supuesto auricular. https://www.youtube.com/live/_Bqr3A6hbdE?si=PhQ4-eLvOflSSqTp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1785471866414776469
participantId -
raterParticipantId - FCA877349499CB0254CEEAEDCAF40BB8FC9749B4AC0ED2475A23E460D6049D32
createdAtMillis - 1714531472981
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1785471866414776469FCA877349499CB0254CEEAEDCAF40BB8FC9749B4AC0ED2475A23E460D6049D32