Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 14:17:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8AF243A8147511628FD3783CE59ACB3A73A7A734A701D0DEA3394F66B33D665
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note does not contain any facts which may have been misrepresented. It’s not all that clear that this post is in any way misleading, or lacking in needed context. Lazy coding is not something that rises to the level of needing a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785449783613948319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8AF243A8147511628FD3783CE59ACB3A73A7A734A701D0DEA3394F66B33D665
  • createdAtMillis - 1714573037559
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785449783613948319C8AF243A8147511628FD3783CE59ACB3A73A7A734A701D0DEA3394F66B33D665