Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 06:32:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2C1519F445C2DFF21872960DA3AF0AC373080B1B2BE1DC4C055DCC085B7A369
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note does not contain any facts which may have been misrepresented. It’s not all that clear that this post is in any way misleading, or lacking in needed context. Lazy coding is not something that rises to the level of needing a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785449783613948319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2C1519F445C2DFF21872960DA3AF0AC373080B1B2BE1DC4C055DCC085B7A369
  • createdAtMillis - 1714545130068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785449783613948319A2C1519F445C2DFF21872960DA3AF0AC373080B1B2BE1DC4C055DCC085B7A369