Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 03:03:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8875D055321D84FDB34ABFFBC0B888F7726FFC5ECB5D8E6E7E9E3874DABD6907
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note does not contain any facts which may have been misrepresented. It’s not all that clear that this post is in any way misleading, or lacking in needed context. Lazy coding is not something that rises to the level of needing a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785449783613948319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8875D055321D84FDB34ABFFBC0B888F7726FFC5ECB5D8E6E7E9E3874DABD6907
  • createdAtMillis - 1714878181025
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17854497836139483198875D055321D84FDB34ABFFBC0B888F7726FFC5ECB5D8E6E7E9E3874DABD6907