Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 20:36:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3A632B5FB2888C295567670E366A012C2812D5CF59FA4E13014B108219E7F1DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

l'auteur du post émet une opinion personnelle, d'autre part la NC proposée est inexacte. La CE n'a pas "jugé", elle a estimé, nuance d'importance, de plus, l'estimation concernait les procureurs (leur champ d'intervention a été réduit depuis) et non les juges, indépendants.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785398545333272871
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3A632B5FB2888C295567670E366A012C2812D5CF59FA4E13014B108219E7F1DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1714509391832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17853985453332728713A632B5FB2888C295567670E366A012C2812D5CF59FA4E13014B108219E7F1DD