Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 12:09:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1037EB32F5A9100D5E5E5F4835EF2550A1F7366B714DF7BEB1F00E01ACFE10D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While factually correct, this not "news" by any measure, and rather openly implies that the reported fact reflects an undesirable state of affairs. It's a perfectly reasonable use of CN to challenge political bias in news reporting, especially taxpayer-funded news.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785258400130929055
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1037EB32F5A9100D5E5E5F4835EF2550A1F7366B714DF7BEB1F00E01ACFE10D
  • createdAtMillis - 1714478980831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785258400130929055E1037EB32F5A9100D5E5E5F4835EF2550A1F7366B714DF7BEB1F00E01ACFE10D