Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 11:22:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28C894AB1E263B99F8AB860655A341329CD95DD85E1F0407C06B085F8BCCC686
Participant Details

Original Note:

While factually correct, this not "news" by any measure, and rather openly implies that the reported fact reflects an undesirable state of affairs. It's a perfectly reasonable use of CN to challenge political bias in news reporting, especially taxpayer-funded news.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785258400130929055
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28C894AB1E263B99F8AB860655A341329CD95DD85E1F0407C06B085F8BCCC686
  • createdAtMillis - 1714476152904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178525840013092905528C894AB1E263B99F8AB860655A341329CD95DD85E1F0407C06B085F8BCCC686