Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 10:19:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFB6B9CBE909758E3EF26FA6A987E2E24EFB8B8E6EA203935345EB9680A61986
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Darstellung eines durchgestrichen Hakenkreuzes ist entgegen der Behauptung des Posterstellers nicht strafbar. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/bundesgerichtshof-durchgestrichene-hakenkreuze-erlaubt-1411353.html?s=09

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785234451926008319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFB6B9CBE909758E3EF26FA6A987E2E24EFB8B8E6EA203935345EB9680A61986
  • createdAtMillis - 1714472342589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785234451926008319BFB6B9CBE909758E3EF26FA6A987E2E24EFB8B8E6EA203935345EB9680A61986