Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 07:28:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A828CC3C26EBCD51151F5B27098FC8210299C21E1DB936DF22683D6529BA794
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : @moutet reprend le texte de l'AFP pour le démonter. Même si les accusations justifiant le licenciement portent sur d'autres points, à confirmer, le post est exact en récusant les arguments que l'AFP rapporte de façon biaisée.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785208713495654905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A828CC3C26EBCD51151F5B27098FC8210299C21E1DB936DF22683D6529BA794
  • createdAtMillis - 1714462085455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17852087134956549054A828CC3C26EBCD51151F5B27098FC8210299C21E1DB936DF22683D6529BA794