Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 11:55:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aus der Quelle geht klar hervor, dass das Gericht sich mit allen 470 Anträgen der AfD befasst hat und diese bewertet hat. Zum Teil sind die Anträge juristisch gar nicht zulässig gewesen. https://t.co/cw42fOhgVZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785154479047811110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1714564528861
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785154479047811110FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3