Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 11:16:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F216BADBA53E147AECE435D5BE3CED93D3BC4B71AF316B84316D60DBB2BE6FE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aus der Quelle geht klar hervor, dass das Gericht sich mit allen 470 Anträgen der AfD befasst hat und diese bewertet hat. Zum Teil sind die Anträge juristisch gar nicht zulässig gewesen. https://t.co/cw42fOhgVZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785154479047811110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F216BADBA53E147AECE435D5BE3CED93D3BC4B71AF316B84316D60DBB2BE6FE8
  • createdAtMillis - 1714475816538
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785154479047811110F216BADBA53E147AECE435D5BE3CED93D3BC4B71AF316B84316D60DBB2BE6FE8