Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 06:03:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86BF7F5B1B6EC7E8C52C953C529205F899E039319BD67E3044333ED319522682
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aus der Quelle geht klar hervor, dass das Gericht sich mit allen 470 Anträgen der AfD befasst hat und diese bewertet hat. Zum Teil sind die Anträge juristisch gar nicht zulässig gewesen. https://t.co/cw42fOhgVZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785154479047811110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86BF7F5B1B6EC7E8C52C953C529205F899E039319BD67E3044333ED319522682
  • createdAtMillis - 1714457024877
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178515447904781111086BF7F5B1B6EC7E8C52C953C529205F899E039319BD67E3044333ED319522682