Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 05:53:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1599228721796E410D2191C399820E9E1D0AE7CCBBF3955C0B4D153A23F4DBB8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aus der Quelle geht klar hervor, dass das Gericht sich mit allen 470 Anträgen der AfD befasst hat und diese bewertet hat. Zum Teil sind die Anträge juristisch gar nicht zulässig gewesen. https://t.co/cw42fOhgVZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785154479047811110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1599228721796E410D2191C399820E9E1D0AE7CCBBF3955C0B4D153A23F4DBB8
  • createdAtMillis - 1714456397790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17851544790478111101599228721796E410D2191C399820E9E1D0AE7CCBBF3955C0B4D153A23F4DBB8