Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 19:50:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D46FAACC902F93D6AFC6F274E52129B4C236F213D319BDA73C1E43B25A65D25
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aus der Quelle geht klar hervor, dass das Gericht sich mit allen 470 Anträgen der AfD befasst hat und diese bewertet hat. Zum Teil sind die Anträge juristisch gar nicht zulässig gewesen. https://t.co/cw42fOhgVZ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785154479047811110
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D46FAACC902F93D6AFC6F274E52129B4C236F213D319BDA73C1E43B25A65D25
  • createdAtMillis - 1714506658644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17851544790478111100D46FAACC902F93D6AFC6F274E52129B4C236F213D319BDA73C1E43B25A65D25