Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 00:52:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B57A4DF1C7D45DF7D6D3F3C1ADF6C1495D549D5EAB31F12FA72B7B40839A6B7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The warrant was being served for: "possession of a firearm by a convicted felon." Additional gun laws wouldn't have affected the outcome as it was already illegal. It's worth noting that criminals often break laws regardless of their existence or stringency. Source: https://www.29news.com/2024/04/29/numerous-law-enforcement-officers-shot-charlotte/?outputType=amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785103256638669246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B57A4DF1C7D45DF7D6D3F3C1ADF6C1495D549D5EAB31F12FA72B7B40839A6B7B
  • createdAtMillis - 1714438369516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785103256638669246B57A4DF1C7D45DF7D6D3F3C1ADF6C1495D549D5EAB31F12FA72B7B40839A6B7B