Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 10:00:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B263E28AC9E7BABD32370BC5EC74124A9BB490BA49C78BB0EA4D5D322C4EC1A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The warrant was being served for: "possession of a firearm by a convicted felon." Additional gun laws wouldn't have affected the outcome as it was already illegal. It's worth noting that criminals often break laws regardless of their existence or stringency. Source: https://www.29news.com/2024/04/29/numerous-law-enforcement-officers-shot-charlotte/?outputType=amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785103256638669246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B263E28AC9E7BABD32370BC5EC74124A9BB490BA49C78BB0EA4D5D322C4EC1A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1714471206239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1785103256638669246B263E28AC9E7BABD32370BC5EC74124A9BB490BA49C78BB0EA4D5D322C4EC1A3