Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 11:18:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1A40BC870D80A15AB230C8026C3185E4BCA3588D8AD1F0F7755125EDFB45E69
Participant Details

Original Note:

Im Text des Artikels geht klar hervor, dass sich das Gericht mit allen 470 Anträgen beschäftigt und diese bewertet hat und aus unterschiedlichen Gründen abgelehnt hat. https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/wird-als-extremistischer-verdachtsfall-gefuehrt-gericht-lehnt-alle-470-afd-antraege-im-streit-gegen-verfassungsschutz-ab_id_259900013.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1785074136483553615
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C1A40BC870D80A15AB230C8026C3185E4BCA3588D8AD1F0F7755125EDFB45E69
createdAtMillis - 1714475887799
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1785074136483553615C1A40BC870D80A15AB230C8026C3185E4BCA3588D8AD1F0F7755125EDFB45E69