Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-30 19:14:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1E1D3C6807CFC7D617D2D7C1620A689CC2C99E1A93346E0D05B1C68449650BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Im Text des Artikels geht klar hervor, dass sich das Gericht mit allen 470 Anträgen beschäftigt und diese bewertet hat und aus unterschiedlichen Gründen abgelehnt hat. https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/wird-als-extremistischer-verdachtsfall-gefuehrt-gericht-lehnt-alle-470-afd-antraege-im-streit-gegen-verfassungsschutz-ab_id_259900013.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1785074136483553615
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A1E1D3C6807CFC7D617D2D7C1620A689CC2C99E1A93346E0D05B1C68449650BC
createdAtMillis - 1714504492339
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1785074136483553615A1E1D3C6807CFC7D617D2D7C1620A689CC2C99E1A93346E0D05B1C68449650BC