Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-28 23:55:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D36B0E51F704E9D0BF9ADEE09D3A35917AFA531B259073FC73CED165191C8A3D
Participant Details
Original Note:
The evidence against chemtrails is robust, with scientific explanations for contrails, regulatory oversight of aircraft emissions, the impracticality of maintaining such a large-scale secret program, and a consensus among experts that chemtrails do not exist. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0014-3 https://www.cnn.com/us/chemtrails-conspiracy-theory-explained-cec/index.html https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/chemtrails-conspiracy-theory https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/science-officially-debunks-chemtrails-conspiracy-live-180960139/ https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/publications/chemtrails-arent-geoengineering-debate-we-should-be-having-because-they-arent-real https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/aircraft-chemtrails-conspiracy-is-long-overdue-for-departure/ https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/regulations-greenhouse-gas-emissions-aircraft
All Note Details