Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-29 13:21:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 669375E7922151599E0A84EC154EF0E7BBEB0B7694834727B80329EF7053ADDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

It has been confirmed by the police that it was not they who covered the memorial. The article is inaccurate https://x.com/metpoliceuk/status/1784356828500922621?s=46&t=e7Bo0-rV_Lou2s6apE5TAQ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1784519310406214065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 669375E7922151599E0A84EC154EF0E7BBEB0B7694834727B80329EF7053ADDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1714396864832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1784519310406214065669375E7922151599E0A84EC154EF0E7BBEB0B7694834727B80329EF7053ADDF