Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-29 13:37:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 220ADBFFE099C3086AEC70970EAB73E8DDAD623FC1DCEABAEF40FF777280B8A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’étude invoquée a été invalidée par l’académie de médecine: https://www.academie-medecine.fr/role-de-lalimentation-bio-sur-le-cancer-lacademie-nationale-de-medecine-alerte-sur-linterpretation-trop-rapide-des-resultats-epidemiologiques/ Autre étude opposée (ie aucun lien entre bio et baisse du cancer ) sur une cohorte 10 fois plus grosse et suivie 2 fois plus longtemps: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24675385/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1784476795862983102
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 220ADBFFE099C3086AEC70970EAB73E8DDAD623FC1DCEABAEF40FF777280B8A6
createdAtMillis - 1714397851415
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1784476795862983102220ADBFFE099C3086AEC70970EAB73E8DDAD623FC1DCEABAEF40FF777280B8A6